Spine 2025;50:562–574
This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that surgical treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) achieves higher rates of complete occlusion and successful treatment compared to endovascular approaches, with lower recurrence and retreatment rates, despite similar neurological improvements and periprocedural complications.
• Objective: Compare the efficacy and safety of surgical vs. endovascular treatments for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
• Methods: Searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until July 2024, identifying 1192 articles, with 40 studies meeting inclusion criteria, involving 1818 patients.
• Results: Surgical treatment showed higher rates of complete occlusion (96.8%) and successful treatment (97.5%) compared to endovascular treatment (72.5% and 66.7%, respectively).
• Recurrence and Retreatment: Lower rates in the surgical group, with endovascular treatment showing higher initial treatment failure.
• Neurological Improvement: Both treatments had similar improvements in neurological status and periprocedural complications, but surgery showed greater improvement in the ALS score.
• Conclusion: Surgical treatment is preferred for definitive results in SDAVFs, but decisions should be individualized based on patient-specific factors. Further research is needed.
• Limitations: Potential publication bias and heterogeneity among included studies.
• Key Insight: This study is the most updated and comprehensive meta-analysis on SDAVF treatments, providing valuable insights for clinical and policy decisions.




















You must be logged in to post a comment.