Neurosurg Focus 59(6):E2, 2025
This review evaluates the contemporary role of microsurgical clipping versus endovascular treatment (EVT) for intracranial aneurysms, comparing long-term durability, complication profiles, and anatomical or patient factors that guide modality selection. It synthesizes trial data (ISAT, BRAT), meta-analyses, and location-specific outcomes to highlight differences in occlusion, retreatment, and morbidity.
The article also outlines practical considerations—hybrid strategies, cerebral bypass, training needs, economics, and global disparities—arguing for individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making and preserving microsurgical expertise despite growing EVT adoption.
Treatment Goals: Exclusion of intracranial aneurysms from circulation while preserving parent vessels and neural function remains the primary objective; both endovascular treatment (EVT) and microsurgical clipping are core modalities.
Long-term Outcomes: Microsurgical clipping offers greater durability and lower rates of recurrence, rebleeding, and retreatment compared to EVT, which has higher retreatment rates despite lower short-term morbidity.
Procedure Selection: EVT is generally preferred for older patients and posterior circulation aneurysms, while microsurgery is favored in younger patients, those with hematomas, mass effect, and aneurysms of the middle cerebral and pericallosal arteries.
Aneurysm Location: Surgical clipping achieves higher occlusion and lower recurrence, especially for anterior circulation, middle cerebral artery, and complex aneurysms; EVT is more suitable for posterior circulation and anatomically challenging cases.
Complications and Adjuncts: Microsurgery allows for evacuation of hematomas and cisternal blood (reducing vasospasm and hydrocephalus), while EVT avoids craniotomy risks but may induce mechanical vasospasm and requires antiplatelet therapy.
Hybrid and Advanced Techniques: Hybrid approaches (combining EVT and surgery) and cerebral bypass remain essential for complex, giant, or recurrent aneurysms not amenable to standard treatments.
Cost and Access: Microsurgical treatment incurs lower overall healthcare costs than EVT; global disparities exist, with surgical clipping dominating in low-resource settings due to limited endovascular infrastructure.
Decision-Making: Optimal management requires individualized, multidisciplinary evaluation considering patient factors, aneurysm characteristics, and resource availability; no single factor should solely dictate treatment choice




















You must be logged in to post a comment.