Tag: Morphological analysis

Posted on

Morphological analysis of the trigeminal nerve in trigeminal neuralgia using the nerve’s centerline and multiple cross-sections of a 3D model

J Neurosurg 142:884–891, 2025

• Study Objective: Quantify morphological changes in trigeminal nerve causing trigeminal neuralgia (TN).

• Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with TN undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD).

• Parameters Analyzed: Centerline length, curvature, torsion, cross-sectional area, flattening ratio, long-axis angle.

• Results: Affected side showed longer centerline, greater curvature, smaller area pre-surgery.

• Postoperative Changes: Affected side showed shorter centerline, larger cross-sectional area post-surgery.

• Concordance Rate: 91.4% between intraoperative findings and 3D model flexion locations.

• Accuracy of Segmentation: Manual segmentation showed 80%-90% concordance with surgical findings.

• Limitations: Retrospective, single institution, manual segmentation, not fully matching surgical findings.

• Further Analyses: Needed for patients without neurovascular compression (NVC) and with venous compression.

• Study Implications: Method helps analyze TN pathophysiology, aid diagnosis, predict treatment efficacy.

• Statistical Analysis: Mann-Whitney U-test, significance set at p < 0.05

Posted on

Are Aneurysms Treated With Balloon-Assisted Coiling and Stent-Assisted Coiling Different?

Are Aneurysms Treated With Balloon-Assisted Coiling and Stent-Assisted Coiling Different?

Neurosurgery 75:145–151, 2014

In the endovascular treatment of wide-necked unruptured aneurysms, there is controversy over which adjunctive device (stent vs balloon) is appropriate. At the payer level it has been posited that stents and balloons treat the same aneurysms, and, as such, the more expensive stents should not be reimbursed.

OBJECTIVE: We challenge this assertion, and instead hypothesize that aneurysms treated with stent assistance are morphologically different than those selected for balloon assistance.

METHODS: Retrospective review of unruptured aneurysms treated with an adjunctive device between 2008 and 2010. Morphological analysis was performed on the pretreatment 2-D catheter angiogram. The immediate posttreatment Raymond score was compared with that seen on the 12-month follow-up angiogram.

RESULTS: One hundred six unruptured aneurysms were treated with an adjunctive device and followed for a mean of 24.5 months. Morphological analysis revealed a lower dome-to-neck ratio (1.5 vs 1.2) and aspect ratio (1.44 vs 1.16) in the aneurysms treated with stent assistance vs balloon assistance. Of the 15.3% that were worse on follow-up angiography, there was no statistical difference between those treated with a stent vs a balloon (17.1% vs 14.2%). The overall re-treatment rate was 10.2% and was not statistically different between the 2 groups (12.7% vs 5.7%).

CONCLUSION: We found that unruptured aneurysms selected for treatment with stent-assisted coiling are morphologically different from those selected for treatment with balloon assistance. Despite the more challenging morphology, Raymond scores and re-treatment rates at 1 year were not statistically different between the 2 groups, suggesting an important role for stents in the treatment of unruptured aneurysms.

Proudly powered by WordPress