Acta Neurochirurgica (2026) 168:117
This study presents a retrospective, landmark-based morphometric analysis of the clivus, tentorium, and posterior cranial fossa on midsagittal MRI in 326 subjects, comparing Chiari malformation Type I (CM-I), Chiari Type 0 (CM-0), and matched controls. Key measured parameters include clivus length and angle, tentorial angle, foramen magnum diameter, and area-based ratios relating cerebellum, posterior fossa, and intracranial cavity.
Findings indicate that CM-I patients exhibit clival shortening, reduced posterior cranial fossa area, altered tentorial orientation, and increased cerebellar occupancy relative to posterior fossa and brain, whereas CM-0 patients show morphometry comparable to controls. The authors conclude CM-I has distinct morphoanatomical remodeling, while CM-0 may represent a functional clinical entity without consistent structural substrate.
Definitions: CM-I is defined by ≥5 mm cerebellar tonsillar descent below the foramen magnum on MRI, while CM-0 is defined by <3 mm descent despite Chiari-like symptoms.
Design: Retrospective mid-sagittal MRI morphometry of 326 adults (CM-I n=111, CM-0 n=27, controls n=188) using multiple cranial base, posterior fossa, cerebellar, and intracranial measurements plus area-based ratios.
Key CM-I anatomy: Compared with CM-0 and controls, CM-I showed shorter clivus length, smaller posterior cranial fossa area, and larger cerebellar area; foramen magnum diameter and total brain area were similar across groups.
Crowding ratios: CM-I had higher cerebellum/posterior fossa and cerebellum/brain area ratios, indicating increased relative cerebellar occupancy despite preserved global cranial proportions.
CM-0 vs controls: CM-0 morphometric measurements were largely comparable to healthy controls, with no consistent structural differences in the main posterior fossa metrics highlighted.
Interpretation: CM-I aligns with a pattern of cranial base remodeling and posterior fossa insufficiency, whereas CM-0 may be better viewed as a functionally defined condition rather than one with a consistent structural substrate.
Reliability/statistics: Analyses used nonparametric tests (Kruskal–Wallis with Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney post hoc), and interobserver measurement reliability was good–excellent (ICC 0.82–0.94).
Limitations: Morphometry was 2D mid-sagittal (not full 3D volumetry) and CSF flow dynamics (e.g., phase-contrast MRI) were not uniformly available, limiting functional assessment—especially relevant to CM-0.




You must be logged in to post a comment.