Tag: Spine surgery

Posted on

Cage migration in multilevel stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: incidence and clinical correlations

J Neurosurg Spine 44:426–435, 2026

This clinical case series compares the incidence and outcomes of lateral interbody cage migration (LCM) following multilevel stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) versus LLIF with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation in 87 age-matched patients. The retrospective analysis reports similar LCM rates (7% vs 5%), no significant differences in complications, and comparable improvements in Oswestry Disability Index and pain scores at ≥1 year follow-up.

The report details patient selection, radiographic assessment methods, operative characteristics, and risk-factor analysis, emphasizing meticulous selection for multilevel stand-alone LLIF. Authors conclude multilevel stand-alone LLIF can be safe in selected patients but call for prospective studies to validate findings and clarify factors contributing to cage migration.

Lateral Cage Migration (LCM) Incidence: LCM occurred in 7% of multilevel stand-alone LLIF cases and 5% of LLIF cases with posterior instrumentation; this difference was not statistically significant.

Patient Selection Criteria: Optimal candidates for multilevel stand-alone LLIF have neutral sagittal and coronal balance, mild to moderate facet arthropathy, stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis, absence of severe central canal stenosis, normal or mildly reduced bone mineral density, and comorbidities or age that increase surgical risk with posterior fixation.

Clinical Outcomes: Both cohorts (stand-alone and posterior instrumentation) showed significant postoperative improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, with no significant differences between groups.

Complication Rates: Postoperative complication rates were similar between groups (23% stand-alone vs. 20% posterior instrumentation), and no intraoperative complications were reported in either group.

Biomechanical Considerations: Supplemental posterior instrumentation increases construct stability, but clinical significance in preventing LCM in well-selected patients remains unclear; stand-alone LLIF can be safe with meticulous patient selection.

Role of Lateral Plates: Adding lateral plates to stand-alone LLIF does not significantly improve stability or reduce cage migration/subsidence in multilevel constructs and may increase cost and risk.

Risk Factors for LCM: No significant demographic, radiographic, or procedural risk factors for LCM were identified in this study; all patients with LCM had normal bone density, and meticulous surgical technique and patient selection are emphasized.

Study Limitations: Retrospective design, single institution, and small sample size may limit generalizability; prospective studies are needed for further validation.

Posted on

The impact of Roussouly sagittal profile changes on postoperative outcomes

J Neurosurg Spine 43:609–615, 2025

This clinical study examines postoperative changes in Roussouly sagittal spinal profiles among 525 adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients and evaluates how shifts between Roussouly types influence mechanical complications and patient-reported outcomes up to two years after fusion surgery. Methods include radiographic classification (current SS-based and theoretical PI-based), HRQOL measures (ODI, SRS-22r, EQ-5D), and multivariate regression to link type changes with PJK/PJF and MCID attainment.

Key findings show 39–59% of patients experienced postoperative Roussouly shape changes, with certain transitions (R1→R2, R2→R4, R3→R4) associated with higher proximal junctional kyphosis/failure risk and R4→R3 linked to greatest mechanical complication risk. R2-mismatched patients had poorer ODI improvement and higher pelvic nonresponse, suggesting Roussouly matching should inform ASD surgical planning.

Roussouly Classification Changes: Postoperative changes in Roussouly sagittal profile are common after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, with 39% of patients experiencing a change in Roussouly type at 6 weeks post-op; type 1 (R1) patients had the highest rate of change (59%) and type 4 (R4) the lowest (26.7%).

Mechanical Complication Risk: Certain Roussouly type changes significantly increase the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and mechanical complications, especially transitions from R1 to R2, R2 to R4, R3 to R4, and R4 to R3.

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Overall, Roussouly type changes were not associated with significant differences in minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement for SRS-22r scores up to 2 years, except for a lower rate of ODI MCID attainment in R2-mismatched patients.

Surgical Invasiveness and Deformity Severity: R1 patients had the most severe baseline deformity and underwent more extensive surgery, which may contribute to higher rates of postoperative Roussouly type changes.

Matching Theoretical Roussouly Type: Only 48% of patients matched their theoretical (PI-based) Roussouly type postoperatively; those who matched, especially in the R2 group, had better functional outcomes and lower rates of pelvic nonresponse (PNR).

Clinical Implications: Maintaining or restoring the original Roussouly type during ASD surgery may reduce the risk of mechanical complications and improve early functional outcomes, particularly for R2 patients.

Limitations: The study was retrospective, single-center, and limited to 2-year follow-up, which may affect generalizability and long-term conclusions.

Surgical Planning: Accounting for Roussouly type changes and known risk factors (e.g., osteoporosis, advanced age) during surgical planning may help decrease postoperative complications.

Posted on

To fuse or not to fuse: surgical strategies for recurrent lumbar disc herniation from a 16-nation study

J Neurosurg Spine 43:681–692, 2025

This international survey examines variability in surgical management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation across 515 spine surgeons from 16 countries, comparing redo discectomy versus various fusion techniques for six clinical scenarios. Findings reveal substantial inter- and intranational differences, specialty-related tendencies, and consensus only for simple first recurrences without back pain.

The study identifies key decision drivers—lumbar pain with radiculopathy and inflammatory disc disease—highlights gaps in high-level evidence, and calls for standardized research, registries, and improved training to harmonize indications and reduce practice heterogeneity.

Significant International Variability: Surgical strategies for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (LDH) vary widely among spine surgeons internationally, especially beyond the first recurrence without low back pain or instability, where decisions are more homogeneous.

Decision-Making Factors: Key factors influencing the choice for fusion over redo discectomy include the presence of low back pain with radiculopathy, radiological evidence of inflammatory disc disease, and the occurrence of second recurrences.

Surgeon Specialty Impact: Orthopedic surgeons are significantly more likely to propose procedures involving implants (fusion) compared to neurosurgeons, regardless of other demographic factors.

Country-Specific Patterns: Countries with low variability (e.g., Portugal, China, UK, Germany) favor posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) and redo discectomy, while countries with high variability (e.g., France, Tunisia, US, Brazil) show more diverse approaches, including anterior and combined procedures.

Limited Influence of Experience and Practice Type: Duration of practice, annual surgical volume, and type of institution (public vs. private) generally do not significantly affect procedure choice, except in some first recurrence cases where public practitioners favor redo discectomy.

Lack of High-Level Evidence: There is a lack of strong, consistent evidence or guidelines favoring one surgical approach over another for recurrent LDH, contributing to the observed variability.

Patient and Surgeon Preferences: Decision-making is influenced by patient preferences, surgeon familiarity with techniques, desire for low-morbidity procedures, and adherence to literature, though economic factors play a lesser role.

Call for Standardization and Research: The findings highlight the need for high-quality studies, improved training, and international collaboration to reduce variability and improve decision-making in recurrent LDH surgery.

Posted on

Intraoperative vancomycin for preventing infection after open spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

J Neurosurg Spine 43:509–518, 2025

A meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials found that intraoperative vancomycin use in open spine surgery did not significantly reduce rates of superficial or deep surgical site infections. Further large-scale studies are needed to clarify its efficacy and inform clinical guidelines.

• A systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2235 patients assessed the efficacy of intraoperative vancomycin in preventing infections after open spine surgery.

• No significant reduction in overall surgical site infections (SSI), deep infections, or superficial infections was found with intraoperative vancomycin compared to control.

• Subgroup analyses showed no benefit in either instrumented or uninstrumented spine surgeries.

• There was no significant shift toward gram-negative or culture-negative infections with vancomycin use.

• Potential risks include local cytotoxicity and possible impairment of bone healing and spinal fusion.

• Current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in vancomycin administration, and variable follow-up durations.

• The study concludes intraoperative vancomycin may not reduce infection risk and further large RCTs are warranted.

Posted on

Development of a unified and comprehensive definition of successful spinal fusion: a systematic review

J Neurosurg Spine 42:403–412, 2025

The document discusses a systematic review aimed at creating a unified definition of successful spinal fusion by integrating clinical symptoms, imaging modalities, and bone healing processes. It proposes a clinical algorithm for evaluating fusion success, emphasizing the need for standardized assessment criteria.

• A systematic review was conducted to develop a unified definition of successful spinal fusion, incorporating clinical symptoms and imaging modalities.

• The review involved 20 studies evaluating 1,324 spinal fusion procedures, resulting in a clinical algorithm for determining fusion success.

• The algorithm stratifies patients as symptomatic or asymptomatic, using specific imaging techniques based on pain type.

• Successful fusion for asymptomatic patients is considered after 12 months, while persistent symptoms indicate failure regardless of radiographic findings.

• Limitations include reliance on imaging and heterogeneous study data, but the algorithm aims to standardize fusion evaluation and improve outcomes.

• Future directions suggest using AI and machine learning for predictive algorithms and evaluating regional differences in fusion assessment.

• The proposed algorithm aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide a shared understanding of successful spinal fusion among clinicians.

• Implementation of the algorithm can enhance outcomes research and assess new developments in spinal fusion.

Posted on

Robotic Spine Surgery: Systematic Review of Common Error Types and Best Practices

Operative Neurosurgery 28:295–302, 2025

• Robotic systems enhance accuracy in pedicle screw placement, reducing complications and hospital stays.

• Common errors in robotic spine surgery include registration, skiving, and interference errors.

• Registration errors occur due to imaging discrepancies or unexpected intraoperative movements.

• Skiving errors result from sliding of drilling instruments, often due to poor entry points.

• Interference errors arise from unintended interactions with soft tissue or robotic system malfunctions.

• Best practices include meticulous preoperative planning and careful patient positioning to minimize errors.

• High BMI and female sex are risk factors for screw deviation due to bone quality issues.

• Modern systems use sharp burrs to reduce skiving by ensuring smooth entry points.

• Soft tissue management is crucial to prevent interference errors during surgery.

• Intraoperative imaging helps confirm accurate screw placement, reducing registration errors.

• Screw failure rates: Registration errors (60%), skiving errors (26.8%), interference errors (19.5%).

• Newer robotic systems show improved accuracy but still face challenges with registration errors.

• Study limitations include varied resources, surgeon experience, and subjective error reporting.

Posted on

Current concepts in adult cervical spine deformity surgery

J Neurosurg Spine 40:439–452, 2024

Cervical spine deformity surgery has significantly evolved over recent decades. There has been substantial work performed, which has furthered the true understanding of alignment and advancements in surgical technique and instrumentation.

Concomitantly, understanding of cervical spine pathology and the contributing drivers have also improved, which have influenced the development of classification systems for cervical spine deformity and the development of treatment-guiding algorithms.

This article aims to provide a synopsis of the current knowledge surrounding cervical spine deformity to date, with particular focus on preoperative expected alignment targets, perioperative optimization, and the whole operative strategy.

Posted on

Anterior retropharyngeal approach (ARPA) for high cervical spine

Acta Neurochirurgica (2024) 166:122

One of the major challenges in operating on the spine lies in taking an anterior approach for the high cervical spine. In patients with a short neck, Klippel-Fiel syndrome or when the C3 vertebra is high in relation to the hyoid bone, it will be difficult to access the C3 body. The transoral route is a highly contaminated zone, and therefore, no instrumentation or grafts can be placed through it.

Method The anterior retropharyngeal approach (ARPA) for the high cervical spine.

Conclusion The anterior retropharyngeal approach is an excellent approach for the high cervical spine where instrumentation is needed. This route provides wide exposure of the C1–C3 region, avoiding the contaminated of the oral cavity.

Posted on

Lateral‑PLIF for spinal arthrodesis

Acta Neurochirurgica (2024) 166:123

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery represents an effective option to treat degenerative conditions in the lumbar spine. To reduce the drawbacks of the classical technique, we developed a variant, so-called Lateral-PLIF, which we then evaluated through a prospective consecutive series of patients.

Methods All adult patients treated at our institute with single or double level Lateral-PLIF for lumbar degenerative disease from January to December 2017 were prospectively collected. Exclusion criteria were patients < 18 years of age, traumatic patients, active infection, or malignancy, as well as unavailability of clinical and/or radiological follow-up data. The technique consists of insert the cages bilaterally through the transition zone between the central canal and the intervertebral foramen, just above the lateral recess. Pre- and postoperative (2 years) questionnaires and phone interviews (4 years) assessed pain and functional outcomes. Data related to the surgical procedure, postoperative complications, and radiological findings (1 year) were collected.

Results One hundred four patients were selected for the final analysis. The median age was 58 years and primary symptoms were mechanical back pain (100, 96.1%) and/or radicular pain (73, 70.2%). We found a high fusion rate (95%). A statistically significant improvement in functional outcome was also noted (ODI p < 0.001, Roland-Morris score p < 0.001). Walking distance increased from 812 m ± 543 m to 3443 m ± 712 m (p < 0.001). Complications included dural tear (6.7%), infection/ wound dehiscence (4.8%), and instrument failure (1.9%) but no neurological deterioration.

Conclusions Lateral-PLIF is a safe and effective technique for lumbar interbody fusion and may be considered for further comparative study validation with other techniques before extensive use to treat lumbar degenerative disease.

Posted on

Long-Term Results After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Neurosurgery 94:454–460, 2024

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a frequent cause of spinal cord dysfunction, and surgical treatment is considered safe and effective. Long-term results after surgery are limited. This study investigated long-term clinical outcomes through data from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery.

METHODS: Patients operated at the university hospitals serving Central and Northern Norway were approached for long-term follow-up after 3 to 8 years. The primary outcome was change in the Neck Disability Index, and the secondary outcomes were changes in the European Myelopathy Scale score, quality of life (EuroQoL EQ-5D); numeric rating scales (NRS) for headache, neck pain, and arm pain; and perceived benefit of surgery assessed by the Global Perceived Effect scale from 1 year to long-term follow-up.

RESULTS: We included 144 patients operated between January 2013 and June 2018. In total, 123 participants (85.4%) provided patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at long-term follow-up. There was no significant change in PROMs from 1 year to long-term follow-up, including Neck Disability Index (mean 1.0, 95% CI À2.1-4.1, P = .53), European Myelopathy Scale score (mean À0.3, 95% CI À0.7-0.1, P = .09), EQ-5D index score (mean À0.02, 95% CI À0.09-0.05, P = .51), NRS neck pain (mean 0.3 95% CI À0.2-0.9, P = .22), NRS arm pain (mean À0.1, 95% CI À0.8-0.5, P = .70), and NRS headache (mean 0.4, 95% CI À0.1-0.9, P = .11). According to Global Perceived Effect assessments, 106/121 patients (87.6%) reported to be stable or improved (“complete recovery,” “much better,” “slightly better,” or “unchanged”) at long-term follow-up compared with 88.1% at 1 year. Dichotomizing the outcome data based on severity of DCM did not demonstrate significant changes either.

CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing surgery for DCM demonstrates persistence of statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement across a wide range of PROMs.

Posted on

Optimizing Surgical Efficiency in Complex Spine Surgery Using Virtual Reality as a Communication Technology to Promote a Shared Mental Model

Operative Neurosurgery 26:213–221, 2024

Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology that can be used to promote a shared mental model among a surgical team. We present a case series demonstrating the use of 3-dimensional (3D) VR models to visually communicate procedural steps to a surgical team to promote a common operating objective. We also review the literature on existing uses of VR for preoperative communication and planning in spine surgery.

METHODS: Narrations of 3 to 4-minute walkthroughs were created in a VR visualization platform, converted, and distributed to team members through text and email the night before surgical intervention. A VR huddle was held immediately before the intervention to refine surgical goals. After the intervention, the participating team members’ perceptions on the value of the tool were assessed using a survey that used a 5-point Likert scale. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Dimensions AI databases were queried from July 2010 to October 2022 to examine existing literature on preoperative VR use to plan spine surgery.

RESULTS: Three illustrative cases are presented with accompanying video. Postoperative survey results demonstrate a positive experience among surgical team members after reviewing preoperative plans created with patient-specific 3D VR models. Respondents felt that preoperative VR video review was “moderately useful” or more useful in improving their understanding of the operational sequence (71%, 5/7), in enhancing their ability to understand their role (86%, 6/7), and in improving the safety or efficiency of the case (86%, 6/7).

CONCLUSION: We present a proof of concept of a novel preoperative communication tool used to create a shared mental model of a common operating objective for surgical team members using narrated 3D VR models. Initial survey results demonstrate positive feedback among respondents. There is a paucity of literature investigating VR technology as a means for preoperative surgical communication in spine surgery.

ETHICS: Institutional review board approval (IRB-300009785) was obtained before this study.

Posted on

Anatomic trajectory for iliac screw placement adapts better to the morphological features of the pelvis of each individual than the S2 alar iliac screw

Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:2607–2614

The iliac fixation (IF) through the S2 ala permits the minimization of implant prominence and tissue dissection. An alternative to this technique is the anatomic iliac screw fixation (AI), which considers the perpendicular axis to the narrowest width of the ileum and the width of the screw. The morphological accuracy of the iliac screw insertion of two low profile iliac fixation (IF) techniques is investigated in this study.

Methods Twenty-nine patients operated on via low profile IF technique were divided into two groups, those treated using 28 screws with the starting point at S2, and those treated with 30 AI entry point. Radiological parameters (Tsv-angle, Sag-Angle, Max-length, sacral-distance, iliac-width, S2-midline, skin-distance, iliac-wing, and PSIS distance) and clinical outcomes (early and clinic complications) were evaluated by two blinded expert radiologists, and the results were compared in both groups with the real trajectory of the screws placed.

Results Differences between ideal and real trajectories were observed in 6 of the 9 evaluated parameters in the S2AI group. In the AI group, these trajectories were similar, except for TSV-Angle, Max-length, Iliac-width, and distance to iliac-wing parameters. Moreover, compared with S2AI, AI provided better adaptation to the pelvic morphology in all parameters, except for sagittal plane angulation, skin distance, and iliac width.

Conclusions AI ensures the advantages of low profile pelvic fixation like S2AI, with a starting point in line with S1 pedicle anchors and low implant prominence, and moreover adapts better to the morphological features of the pelvis of each individual.

Posted on

“July Effect” in Spinal Fusions: A Coarsened Exact-Matched Analysis

Neurosurgery 92:623–631, 2023

Few neurosurgical studies examine the July Effect within elective spinal procedures, and none uses an exact-matched protocol to rigorously account for confounders.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the July Effect in single-level spinal fusions, after coarsened exact matching of the patient cohort on key patient characteristics (including race and comorbid status) known to independently affect neurosurgical outcomes.

METHODS: Two thousand three hundred thirty-eight adult patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion at a single, multicenter university hospital system were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcomes included readmissions, emergency department visits, reoperation, surgical complications, and mortality within 30 days of surgery. Logistic regression was used to analyze month as an ordinal variable. Subsequently, outcomes were compared between patients with surgery at the beginning vs end of the academic year (ie, July vs April–June), before and after coarsened exact matching on key characteristics. After exact matching, 99 exactly matched pairs of patients (total n = 198) were included for analysis.

RESULTS: Among all patients, operative month was not associated with adverse postoperative events within 30 days of the index operation. Furthermore, patients with surgeries in July had no significant difference in adverse outcomes. Similarly, between exact-matched cohorts, patients in July were observed to have noninferior adverse postoperative events.

CONCLUSION: There was no evidence suggestive of a July Effect after single-level, posterior approach spinal fusions in our cohort. These findings align with the previous literature to imply that teaching hospitals provide adequate patient care throughout the academic year, regardless of how long individual resident physician assistants have been in their particular role.

Posted on

Rod fractures in thoracolumbar fusions to the sacrum/pelvis for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis

J Neurosurg Spine 38:217–229, 2023

Previous reports of rod fracture (RF) in adult spinal deformity are limited by heterogeneous cohorts, low follow-up rates, and relatively short follow-up durations. Since the majority of RFs present > 2 years after surgery, true occurrence and revision rates remain unclear. The objectives of this study were to better understand the risk factors for RF and assess its occurrence and revision rates following primary thoracolumbar fusions to the sacrum/pelvis for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) in a prospective series with long-term follow-up.

METHODS Patient records were obtained from the Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis–1 (ASLS-1) database, an NIH-sponsored multicenter, prospective study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged 40–80 years undergoing primary surgeries for ASLS (Cobb angle ≥ 30° and Oswestry Disability Index ≥ 20 or Scoliosis Research Society-22r ≤ 4.0 in pain, function, and/or self-image) with instrumented fusion of ≥ 7 levels that included the sacrum/pelvis. Patients with and without RF were compared to assess risk factors for RF and revision surgery.

RESULTS Inclusion criteria were met by 160 patients (median age 62 years, IQR 55.7–67.9 years). At a median followup of 5.1 years (IQR 3.8–6.6 years), there were 92 RFs in 62 patients (38.8%). The median time to RF was 3.0 years (IQR 1.9–4.54 years), and 73% occurred > 2 years following surgery. Based on Kaplan-Meier analyses, estimated RF rates at 2, 4, 5, and 8 years after surgery were 11%, 24%, 35%, and 49%, respectively. Baseline radiographic, clinical, and demographic characteristics were similar between patients with and without RF. In Cox regression models, greater postoperative pelvic tilt (HR 1.895, 95% CI 1.196–3.002, p = 0.0065) and greater estimated blood loss (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.005–1.036, p = 0.0088) were associated with increased risk of RF. Thirty-eight patients (61% of all RFs) underwent revision surgery. Bilateral RF was predictive of revision surgery (HR 3.52, 95% CI 1.8–6.9, p = 0.0002), while patients with unilateral nondisplaced RFs were less likely to require revision (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18–0.84, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS This study provides what is to the authors’ knowledge the highest-quality data to date on RF rates following ASLS surgery. At a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 38.8% of patients had at least one RF. Estimated RF rates at 2, 4, 5, and 8 years after surgery were 11%, 24%, 35%, and 49%, respectively. Greater estimated blood loss and postoperative pelvic tilt were significant risk factors for RF. These findings emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up to realize the true prevalence and cumulative incidence of RF.

Posted on

Longitudinal assessment of segmental motion of the cervical spine following total disc arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of devices

J Neurosurg Spine 37:556–562, 2022

Total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been shown to be an effective and safe treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease at short- and midterm follow-up. However, there remains a paucity of literature reporting the differences between individual prosthesis designs with regard to device performance. In this study, the authors evaluated the longterm maintenance of segmental range of motion (ROM) at the operative cervical level across a diverse range of TDA devices.

METHODS In this study, the authors retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent 1- or 2-level cervical TDA between 2005 and 2020 at a single institution. Patients with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up and lateral flexion/extension radiographs preoperatively, 2 months postoperatively, and at final follow-up were included. Radiographic measurements included static segmental lordosis, segmental range of motion (ROM) on flexion/extension, global cervical (C2–7) ROM on flexion/extension, and disc space height. The paired t-test was used to evaluate improvement in radiographic parameters. Subanalysis between devices was performed using one-way ANCOVA. Significance was determined at p < 0.05.

RESULTS A total of 85 patients (100 discs) were included, with a mean patient age of 46.01 ± 8.82 years and followup of 43.56 ± 39.36 months. Implantations included 22 (22.00%) M6-C, 51 (51.00%) Mobi-C, 14 (14.00%) PCM, and 13 (13.00%) ProDisc-C devices. There were no differences in baseline radiographic parameters between groups. At 2 months postoperatively, PCM provided significantly less segmental lordosis (p = 0.037) and segmental ROM (p = 0.039). At final follow-up, segmental ROM with both the PCM and ProDisc-C devices was significantly less than that with the M6-C and Mobi-C devices (p = 0.015). From preoperatively to 2 months postoperatively, PCM implantation led to a significant loss of lordosis (p < 0.001) and segmental ROM (p = 0.005) relative to the other devices. Moreover, a significantly greater decline in segmental ROM from 2 months postoperatively to final follow-up was seen with ProDiscC, while segmental ROM increased significantly over time with Mobi-C (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS Analysis by TDA device brand demonstrated that motion preservation differs depending on disc design. Certain devices, including M6-C and Mobi-C, improve ROM on flexion/extension from preoperatively to postoperatively and continue to increase slightly at final follow-up. On the other hand, devices such as PCM and ProDisc-C contributed to greater segmental stiffness, with a gradual decline in ROM seen with ProDisc-C. Further studies are needed to understand how much segmental ROM is ideal after TDA for preservation of physiological cervical kinematics.

 

Posted on

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Cost of a Surgeon’s Learning Curve

World Neurosurg. (2022) 162:e1-e7

Minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion has become an increasingly common approach in adult degenerative spine disease but is associated with a steep learning curve. We sought to evaluate the impact of the learning experience on mean procedure time and mean cost associated with each procedure.

METHODS: We studied the first 100 consecutive minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion procedures of a single surgeon. We performed multivariable linear regression models, modeling operating time, and costs in function of the procedure order adjusted for patients’ age, sex, and number of surgical levels. The number of procedures necessary to attain proficiency was determined through a k-means cluster analysis. Finally, the total excess operative time and total excess cost until obtaining proficiency was evaluated.

RESULTS: Procedure order was found to impact procedure time and mean costs, with each successive case being associated with progressively less procedure time and cost. On average, each successive case was associated with a reduction in procedure time of 0.97 minutes (95% confidence interval 0.54e1.40; P < 0.001) and an average adjusted reduction in overall costs of $82.75 (95% confidence interval $35.93e129.57; P < 0.001). An estimated 58 procedures were needed to attain proficiency, translating into an excess procedure time of 2604.2 minutes (average of 45 minutes per case), overall costs associated with the learning experience of $226,563.8 (average of $3974.80 per case), and excess surgical cost of $125,836.6 (average of $2207.66 per case).

CONCLUSIONS: Successive cases were associated with progressively less procedure time and mean overall and surgical costs, until a proficiency threshold was attained.

Posted on

Robotic-Assisted vs Nonrobotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cost-Utility Analysis

Neurosurgery 90:192–198, 2022

Management of degenerative disease of the spine has evolved to favor minimally invasive techniques, including nonrobotic-assisted and robotic-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Value-based spending is being increasingly implemented to control rising costs in the US healthcare system. With an aging population, it is fundamental to understand which procedure(s) may be most cost-effective.

OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic and nonrobotic MIS-TLIF through a cost-utility analysis.

METHODS: We considered direct medical costs related to surgical intervention and to the hospital stay, as well as 1-yr utilities. We estimated costs by assessing all cases involving adults undergoing robotic surgery at a single institution and an equal number of patients undergoing nonrobotic surgery, matched by demographic and clinical characteristics. We adopted a willingness to pay of $50 000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Uncertainty was addressed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS: Costs were estimated based on a total of 76 patients, including 38 undergoing robot-assisted and 38 matched patients undergoing nonrobot MIS-TLIF. Using point estimates, robotic surgery was projected to cost $21 546.80 and to be associated with 0.68 QALY, and nonrobotic surgery was projected to cost $22 398.98 and to be associated with 0.67 QALY. Robotic surgery was found to be more cost-effective strategy, with costeffectiveness being sensitive operating room/materials and room costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis identified robotic surgery as cost-effective in 63% of simulations.

CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that at a willingness to pay of $50 000/QALY, robotic assisted MIS-TLIF was cost-effective in 63% of simulations. Cost-effectiveness depends on operating room and room (admission) costs, with potentially different results under distinct neurosurgical practices.

Posted on

Collaborative spinal robot system for laminectomy: a preliminary study

Neurosurg Focus 52 (1):E11, 2022

The application of robots in the field of pedicle screw placement has achieved great success. However, decompressive laminectomy, a step that is just as critical as pedicle screw placement, does not have a mature robot-assisted system. To address this lack, the authors designed a collaborative spine robot system to assist with laminectomy. In this study, they aimed to investigate the reliability of this novel collaborative spinal robot system and compare it with manual laminectomy (ML).

METHODS Thirty in vitro porcine lumbar vertebral specimens were obtained as experimental bone specimens. Robot-assisted laminectomy (RAL) was performed on the left side of the lamina (n = 30) and ML was performed on the right side (n = 30). The time required for laminectomy on one side, whether the lamina was penetrated, and the remaining thickness of the lamina were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS The time required for laminectomy on one side was longer in the RAL group than in the ML group (median 326 seconds [IQR 133 seconds] vs 108.5 seconds [IQR 43 seconds], p < 0.001). In the RAL group, complete lamina penetration occurred twice (6.7%), while in the ML group, it occurred 9 times (30%); the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.045). There was no statistically significant difference in the remaining lamina thickness between the two groups (median 1.035 mm [IQR 0.419 mm] vs 1.084 mm [IQR 0.383 mm], p = 0.842).

CONCLUSIONS The results of this study confirm the safety of this novel spinal robot system for laminectomy. However, its efficiency requires further improvement.

Posted on

Double tubular minimally invasive spine surgery: a novel technique expands the surgical visual field during resection of intradural pathologies

J Neurosurg Spine 36:160–163, 2022

A major challenge of a minimally invasive spinal approach (MIS) is maintaining freedom of maneuverability through small operative corridors. Unfortunately, during tubular resection of intradural pathologies, the durotomy and its accompanying tenting sutures offer a smaller operating window than the maximum surface of the tube’s base. The objective of this study was to evaluate if a novel double tubular technique could expand the surgical visual field during MIS resection of intradural pathologies.

METHODS A total of 25 MIS resections of intradural extramedullary pathologies were included. A posterior tubular interlaminar fenestration was performed in all surgeries. A durotomy covering the whole diameter of the tubular base was the standard in all cases. After placement of two tenting sutures on each side of the durotomy and application of tension, the resulting surface of the achieved dura fenestration was measured after optical analysis of the intraoperative video. In the next step, a second tube, 2 mm thinner than and the same length as the first, was inserted telescopically into the first tube, resulting an angulated fulcrum effect on the tenting sutures.

RESULTS Optical surface analysis of the dura fenestration before and after the second tubular insertion verified a significant widening of the visual field of 43.1% (mean 18.84 mm2, 95% CI 16.8–20.8, p value < 0.001). There were no ruptured tenting sutures through the increased tension. Postoperative MRIs verified complete resection of the pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS Inserting a second tube telescopically during posterior minimally invasive tubular spinal intradural surgery leads to an angulated fulcrum effect on the dura tenting sutures which consequently increases the surface of the dura fenestration and induces a meaningful widening of the visual field.

Posted on

Negligible Systemic Uptake of Suprafascial Vancomycin Powder Following Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion

Neurosurgery 89:967–972, 2021

Intrawound vancomycin powder is an emerging strategy to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in spine surgery. However, there are concerns relating to its safety profile and toxicity. Data on systemic uptake of suprafascially administered vancomycin powder following instrumented spinal fusion is lacking.

OBJECTIVE: To study the systemic uptake and safety of suprafascially administered vancomycin powder in the early postoperative phase following open instrumented posterior spinal fusion.

METHODS: This was a substudy of an ongoing randomized clinical trial. Eligible adult patients were randomized 1:1 to either receive suprafascial vancomycin powder before wound closure or not to receive vancomycin powder. Serum vancomycin levels were assessed on postoperative days 1 and 2, serum creatinine levels were measured pre- and post-operatively. Adverse events up to 6 wk following surgery were recorded.

RESULTS:Among34 randomized patients (mean age 62 yr, range 31-84 yr; 18 [53%]women), 17 received vancomycin powder. No detectable serum vancomycin levels (>4.0mg/L)were found. Proportion of adverse events per patient in the vancomycin and control group, respectively,were 29.4% (5/17) vs 11.8% (2/17) (OR 3.12;95%CI, 0.52; 19.38; P=.398).No patient had nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity in either group. CONCLUSION: Suprafascial vancomycin powder in open instrumented spinal fusion surgery is safe and results in negligible systemic uptake. Final results of the VANCO Trial need to be awaited for conclusive data on the efficacy of vancomycin for SSI prevention and its impact on wound healing.

 

Proudly powered by WordPress