Neurosurgery 82:329–334, 2018
The association between long work hours and outcomes among attending surgeons remains an issue of debate.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether operating emergently the night before an elective case was associated with inferior outcomes among attending neurosurgeons.
METHODS:We executed a cohort study with unruptured cerebral aneurysm patients,who underwent endovascular coiling or surgical clipping from 2009 to 2013 and were registered in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systemdatabase. We investigated the association of treatment by surgeons performing emergency procedures the night before with outcomes of elective cerebral aneurysm treatment using an instrumental variable analysis. RESULTS:Overall, 4700 patients underwent treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Therewas no difference in inpatient mortality (adjusted difference, –0.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –1.4% to 0.02%), discharge to a facility (adjusted difference, –0.1%; 95% CI, –1.2% to 1.2%), or length of stay (adjusted difference, –0.58; 95% CI, –1.66 to 0.50) between patients undergoing elective cerebral aneurysm treatment by surgeons who performed emergency procedures the night before, and those who did not.
CONCLUSION: Using a comprehensive patient cohort in New York State for elective treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms, we did not identify an association of treatment by surgeons performing emergency procedures the night before, with mortality, discharge to a facility, or length of stay. Our study had 80% power to detect differences inmortality (our primary outcome), as small as 4.1%. The results of the present study do not support the argument for regulation of attending work hours.
You must be logged in to post a comment.